First, a newborn was taken into custody after a mother refused a vaccine.
Â
Â
Â
Next...
Â
Â
Obamacare will bombard people with vaccine promotions
From that article:
Note: Again for those wanting to read over the sections, subsections, and provision paragraphs of the Obamacare law as what was outlined in this article the PDF to the Obamacare law can be found here(Archived at USWGO).
Under Obamacare there will be grant programs for states to implement a debt collector style bombardment of vaccine promotions and even use assessment programs to target those the refuse to take the vaccination shots.
Again for those that don’t know what Obamacare’s real name is called, it is titled the “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act†(PPACA) or (ACA).
Under Title IV (Prevention of chronic disease and Improving public health) the same Title as where the Public Health Council provisions are also under as what was outlined in the last USWGO article on Obamacare, Subtitle C—Creating Healthier Communities, Sec. 4204. Immunizations., the Secretary may negotiate and enter into contracts with manufacturers of vaccines for the purchase and delivery of vaccines for adults as provided for under subsection (e), and subsection (e) describes of a GAO Study and Report on medicare beneficiary access to vaccines. To dig even further the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the ability of Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older to access routinely recommended vaccines covered under the prescription drug program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act over the period since the establishment of such program.
This is all along with the Public Health Council that will work on a number of issues to make sure the Government controls what people eat, that people won’t be addicted to tobacco, and that the government makes sure people get enough exercise as what is recommended by the health council as what was outlined in the last Obamacare article by USWGO.
That means that vaccines will be recommended by the government instead of professional medical advisers such as private doctors. The government will now decide what vaccinations people should be recommended to getting despite some vaccines permanent damage side affects which including seizures, autism, cancer viruses, and other viruses now being planted in the vaccines.
That doesn’t even cover half of what is in Section 4204. I will continue on to the fact that people will now be bombarded by government notices to encourage people to take vaccination shots even the ones that cause autism, seizures, and blindness.
Under Section (m)–Demonstration Program to Improve Immunization Coverage (124 STAT. 571), Paragraph (1), The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall establish a demonstration program to award grants to States to improve the provision of recommended immunizations for children, adolescents, and adults through the use of evidence-based, population-based interventions for high-risk populations.
Of course the evidence that is collected on vaccination recommendations will not come from Independent Researchers like Mike Adams of Natural News, Alex Jones of Infowars.com, Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News, and other skilled vaccine researchers that find the truth on vaccines and the risks it poses to human health. The evidence to the CDC will likely be from corporate pharmaceuticals such as Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Rockefeller Foundation, Merck, and other large-scale drug companies and corporations that only knows best for public health when their convictions are corrupted by a need to profit off of increasing human sickness. They don’t even hide the business model that the more patients get sick the more money is lined up to the pockets of Big Pharma.
Under Paragraph (2) known as State Plan, To be eligible for a grant under paragraph (1), a State shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, including a State plan that describes the interventions to be implemented under the grant and how such interventions match with local needs and capabilities, as determined through consultation with local authorities.
That means that if a state decides to accept Federal grant money as what is entitled under Obamacare law, they will have to force those that refuse to take vaccinations with vaccine interventions that will match the local needs and capabilities as determined with the local police and health department. Much like how family intervenes alcoholics, pressure will be put on those that don’t want to take vaccinations for religious and medical reasons.
Now lets review Paragraph (3) known as the Use of Funds, ‘‘Funds received under a grant under this subsection shall be used to implement interventions that are recommended by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (as established by the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) or other evidence-based interventions, including†the following in the orderly list.
1. Subsection (A) providing immunization reminders or recalls for target populations of clients, patients, and consumers;
2. Subsection (B) educating targeted populations and health care providers concerning immunizations in combination with one or more other interventions;
3. Subsection (C) reducing out-of-pocket costs for families for vaccines and their administration;
4. Subsection (D) carrying out immunization-promoting strategies for participants or clients of public programs, including assessments of immunization status, referrals to health care providers, education, provision of on-site immunizations, or incentives for immunization;
5. Subsection (E) providing for home visits that promote immunization through education, assessments of need, referrals, provision of immunizations, or other services;
6. Subsection (F) providing reminders or recalls for immunization providers;
7. Subsection (G) conducting assessments of, and providing feedback to, immunization providers;
8. Subsection (H) any combination of one or more interventions described in this paragraph; or
9. Subsection ‘(I) immunization information systems to allow all States to have electronic databases for immunization records.
Now let’s go over what I just posted above.
Like I described above, any states that wish to receive this Federal grant money as provided under Obamacare, acting through the director of the CDC, to implement local government interventions to get people to take the vaccines as what is recommended by the CDC. This will likely be through the counties health department with assistance of the local police or Sheriff.
There's more at the link above.
And then this...
Vaccine bombshell: Baby monkeys develop autism symptoms after obtaining doses of popular vaccines
From that article:
Following a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania which revealed that many infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research,developed autism symptoms, question marks over the ultimate safety of vaccines have come to the fore.
The groundbreaking research findings presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, have revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys’ sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Theirunvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.
This development which deconstructs mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism, was brought on by after studies on the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted — but never has — for such regimens.
Included in the mix were vaccines containing Thimerosal, a toxic, mercury-based compound that has been phased out of some vaccines, but is still present in batch-size influenza vaccines and a few others.
Also administered was the controversial measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which has been linked time and time again to causing autism and various other serious, and often irreversible, health problems in children.
“This research underscores the critical need for more investigation into immunizations, mercury, and the alterations seen in autistic children,†said Lyn Redwood, Director of SafeMinds, a public safety group working to expose the truth about vaccines and autism.
“SafeMinds calls for large scale, unbiased studies that look at autism medical conditions and the effects of vaccines given as a regimen.â€
Adding to the sentiment, Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds called out the CDC for failing to require proper safety studies of its recommended vaccination schedules. Unlike all other drugs, which must at least undergo a basic round of safety testing prior to approval and recommendation, vaccinations and vaccine schedules in particular do not have to be proven safe or effective before hitting the market.
Â
Â
Â
Â
This site has some more information and stories about vaccines:
Â
Study: 97 Percent of Children Affected by 2009 Mumps Outbreak Were Vaccinated for Condition
Â
Â
Â
*******************
Â
Â
Â
For years, Jenny McCarthy has been demonized for believing that her child's autism started with vaccines. There's even one site that posted a pretend study saying that Jenny McCarthy causes autism. There was a study that showed that vaccines caused autism, but it was later "decided" by other experts that it was a flawed study. Now, there's been a study showing that monkeys got autism from vaccines. Wouldn't it be grand if our government took this more seriously? They're wanting to poke and prod in all parts of our lives, but they have chosen to allow vaccines of all sorts to come to the market with little to no advanced testing.
Â
But, no, our government doesn't want answers. They want all of us to receive vaccines that they decide are necessary. And Obamacare will allow them to figure out a way to force us all to get them.
Â
Right now, we're being bombarded with signs and reminders from pharmacists, doctors, nurses, receptionists, that the flu vaccine is available. You don't even have to go to a doctor's office any more. You can get your shot at your local grocery store or pharmacy.
Â
But I asked a contact at Facebook today, who are these people who get the flu. He recited the numbers he's been fed - that 36,000 people die each year, just in the United States, from flu.
Â
Who are these people?
Â
A few years ago, when I started realizing what was in the vaccines they were pushing on us and how little research was done to see if they were safe for any of us, I picked up the phone and called every single hospital within a 50 mile radius of where I lived. I inquired about flu cases that were serious enough to have a person hospitalized and flu cases that caused deaths. Their PR persons quoted all the same statistics from that year that the CDC and WHO had been feeding everyone. But when I asked about specifics about each hospital, only one had any serious "outbreak" and they had admitted exactly 3 people during that flu season. No one had died in these hospitals from flu.
Â
In all of my 60 years, I have known one person who had the flu, and that was my Dad and it was when I was about 9 or 10 years old.
Â
I used to think with all of my maladies, and a supposed weakened immune system, that getting a flu shot each year made sense. But not once I realized what was in them. And not once I realized how much my body already hates what chemicals I do have to put into it. Introducing more chemicals, unnecessary ones, is absurd. During "flu season" I make sure that I wash my hands a lot and when I'm out and about running errands, I make sure that I don't put my hands anywhere near my eyes, nose or mouth, until I can wash them again. I steer clear of people who are coughing too. And I take lots of Vitamin C and Zinc.
Â
Â
Â















Comments: 38
I feel for those how have adverse effects from the shots, and do understand why some don't get them it just isn't for me. My son is old enough to make his choices, but doesn't change what I think he should do.
Personally, I don't understand why anyone gets the flu shots.
So what else is it that you think you need to get a booster on? Tetanus isn't a big deal, since you can get one after being injured.
When I get a burn or cut it is more likely I will get an infection and for me it only takes a few hours for me to go from being healthy to having blood poisening so I usually get a shot of penicillian to ward it off if it has already started.
You can see a list of shots and when and if you should get them at.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vaccines/MY01188
That's precisely why I do NOT take flu shots. I have not had the flu since I started washing my hands many times when I'm in public (came from a compromised immune system chemo lesson), combined with taking better care of my health.
Flu shots contain three virus strains, they guess at which strains might be the most effective and that's based on guessed weather trends. Unless you've built up your own immunity to a particular virus, if it's not in the shot then the shot does you absolutely no good as protection against it. That's a fact.
The best way to protect against illness is to eat & live healthy. There isn't a pill for eveything and what pills there are are proven UNhealthy, only to be taken when medically necessary. And you wonder why all of the diseases today that we did not have 20-years ago, 50-years ago? Common sense prevails.
No offense Pamela, but your way of thinking is from what you've been taught is part of the Progressive "indoctrination" that's followed you throughout your young life. You're handing it down to your children. I urge you to pay closer attention to decisions like these. I am shocked that any child over the age of 11 would have any need whatsoever for "booster shots," OMG.
My elderly aunt has a saying for occasions such as this: "I've lived too long."
I do NOT trust doctors.....I do trust my own self........and every year I say "NO" to the flu shot.......even hubby, who's had a major illness, will NOT get the flu or pneumonia shot, as he got very sick from getting them last year.....I told him, no more, no way.
God hasn't told me not to get it so I will continue to get them. When he moves then they will stop. He's working on that, trust me :).
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
That word translated as 'sorcerer', was 'pharmakon' in the original Greek. It meant someone that mixed potions, spell casting concoctions, like to protect people from sickness . .
As far as I'm concerned, I've been warned. This stuff is potentially very dangerous, and if it's not being tested rigorously (as it very obviously, to me, is not), I consider it an "official" sin to accept into my body, or allow it to be injected into the body of another whom I have the power to authorize such things for. I've been warned about spell casting potions, by Christ no less . . I have no excuse for acting like this stuff can't hurt people.
This is one of the most critical articles I've read of late, Marilyn. Thank you for such invaluable information. Mothers & Fathers beware. If they don't kill our babies with abortion, they'll find another way. Cas Sunstein is written all over this, e.g., population control. I wish it were as simple as "population," these tencales undoubtedly being more long-reaching. I am not evil minded enough to even pretend to guess.
God protect us.
I do NOT need any doctors or anybody telling me what I have to, or not have, to do......I am old enough to think for myself.
It seems that the left has found the one area where people want government intervention to the max. In order to have "free" health care, they will give up their freedoms. Even that was done gradually, first by having government health care for the elderly and the poor. With my cataract surgery, I was so angry at our government for what they do to our elderly. Knowing that they have no choice at all, nor do their doctors, in the kinds of lenses implanted makes me angry. I would not have known had I not had this done myself before retirement and Medicare.
Then, of course, there's the RFID chip being offered to keep track of medical things. Folks are being told that it will make it better and easier for medical professionals to know everything about them should an emergency occur.
Using health care as the line being drawn to see who is with them and who is not is pretty smart, actually.
Who will allow themselves to be chipped? Who will allow themselves to be forced to received vaccines....or whatever else the government dictates?
You're right. A link is missing. Here's one that helps one's representatives: Find your lawmakers
That being said, I have been reading a few books about some of the natural ways one can first keep cancer away and secondly fight it should cancer strike. You have to wonder why there was so much less cancer in the past than now.
Refusal To Put Child On Psych Drugs Results In Swat Teams & a TANK. This is in America!
This has made it more cost effective for those who CHOOSE to take a vaccine as mandated by worldly organizations. THE OBAMA CARE ACT was put together by MANY to be tweeked at later dates SHOULD the PEOPLE CHOOSE to help tweek it.
What excellent advice, all of it, but this stood out in particular.
As with the new tax quagmire... It has to do with representations of YOUR GOVERNMENTS.
We can't BLAME OUR PRESIDENT we can lay the blame on those who REFUSE to act for the commons, IE the 47% who blindly trusted in their representatives who sold them out to keep the peace within the deep pockets.
I for (1) will be watching WHO votes and how they vote when the wrangling begins again over the issues that could very well have been the begining of the worst depression this nation has seen. Will you?
Eugenicists have looked for ways to re-engineer the population since the "science" was invented. The most famous example was Hitler's notoriously hideous genocide efforts, and more recently those attempted in the former Yugoslavia.
Since we know Eugenicists were involved in crafting and implementing Obamacare (most notably Ezekiel Emanuel and Cass Sunstein), and that one of the longstanding megafears of global Socialists has been overpopulation, there would have been reason enough to be very concerned about the actual content of the 2700-page (deliberately) overlong Obamacare bill.
We also know that the doctrine of Marxism champions the cause of "labor" as a source of value and power. According to Marx, the Haves got what they have by exploiting others' labor. Communist governments have therefore tended to tout the efforts of the worker, which is why the former Soviet Union's most prominent symbol, the hammer and sickle, were workmens' tools of production.
Taking this seriously, when value is put exclusively in those terms and combined with a collectivist philosophy that the individual is of value mainly as a piece of a greater and far more important whole, the value system which emerges tends to focus on promoting hard work for the benefit of "the people" or collective, while putting a very low value on anyone who cannot work, i.e. the old and the disabled. It's easy to conclude that the collective benefits by eliminating those who cannot work, whose needs are a drag on the "progress" of the collective, especially for anyone who is not privy to the Judeo-Christian tradition of placing very high value on the individual "soul."
So in a Marxist-oriented regime like Obama's, there is an incentive to use political power to "refine" the population based on the individual's ability to productively contribute to the collective. Government-controlled health care gives politicians control of the people's health, and therefore their lives. The potential misuse of that power is virtually limitless, including the power to end life more or less at govenrment's whim.
One thing which restrains Marxism in our society from openly promoting a re-engineering of population is the Constitution, with its legalization of individual rights and democratic procedures. In fact the consequent need of many political authorities for votes might be considered a main reason American Marxism has tended to appear to be so concerned for every individual, including the infirm and elderly.
Should their voluntary support no longer be needed to support the power of government, that evident "humanitarianism" would be expected to change. In a real sense it already has, since among Obamacare's most prominent provisions is mandated health insurance for the young, big cuts to Medicare, and new panels and commissions with power to review and judge the merit of individual medical needs.
Any time anyone in a leadership position says "we need to pass the bill to find out what is in it," you can be pretty darned sure there is plenty in it very few would actually approve of if it was presented in an easily digestible form.
Eugenicists love to find cleverly subtle ways to carry out their particular dream of "perfecting" humankind. Gas chambers designed to look like showers. Death camps designed to look like summer camps or even vacation resorts. Poisons presented as medications. Although it is easy to become paranoid about what exactly the latest cleverly deceptive method might be, recommended not to say mandated vaccinations certainly would fit the methodology.
It comes down to who do you trust. Anyone who calls himself or herself a Eugenicist or has been described as such based on their stated beliefs and advocacies ought to be scrutinized very carefully and only given authority over anything which affects even one other person with the greatest caution. Even in hospitals there have been incidents when a medical practicioner decided so-and-so must not be allowed to pollute the human species further, and devised a clever way to accomplish that.
When I heard those words from Pelosi's mouth and the lamestream media was silent, I knew our problems were worse than any of us realized.
Who can we trust?